Architect production-ready Node apps using proven design patterns.
Welcome to our exploration of Layered & Hexagonal Architecture in Node.js! These architectural patterns are essential for building scalable and maintainable backend systems. We'll dive into the core concepts, benefits, and real-world applications of these architectures.
Layered architecture organizes an application into distinct layers, each with a specific responsibility. This separation of concerns makes the system easier to understand, maintain, and scale.
Hexagonal architecture (also known as Ports and Adapters) focuses on creating a technology-independent core domain. The hexagon represents the business logic, with ports connecting to external systems.
// Hexagonal Architecture Structure
const ports = {
database: DatabaseAdapter,
httpServer: HttpServerAdapter,
messageQueue: MessageQueueAdapter
};
// Core domain logic remains unchanged
const domainLogic = require('./domain');
Dependency injection (DI) is a critical concept in layered architecture. It allows us to decouple components and make the system more testable and maintainable.
// Example of dependency injection
interface Database {
findUser(id: string): Promise<User>;
}
export class UserService {
private database: Database;
constructor(database: Database) {
this.database = database;
}
async getUser(id: string) {
return await this.database.findUser(id);
}
}
Welcome to the world of message queues and background jobs! In this chapter, we'll explore how to handle asynchronous tasks and scale your Node.js applications using RabbitMQ and BullMQ. These tools are essential for building scalable systems that can handle high volumes of work without blocking your main application.
A message queue is a software component that acts as an intermediary for sending and receiving messages between different services. It allows you to decouple the sender of a message from the receiver, enabling asynchronous communication.
RabbitMQ is a popular open-source message broker that implements the AMQP protocol. It's widely used for building distributed systems and microservices architectures.
// Setting up RabbitMQ Producer
const amqp = require('amqplib');
async function setupProducer() {
const connection = await amqp.connect('amqp://localhost');
const channel = await connection.createChannel();
await channel.assertQueue('tasks');
return { channel, connection };
}
// Setting up RabbitMQ Consumer
async function setupConsumer() {
const connection = await amqp.connect('amqp://localhost');
const channel = await connection.createChannel();
await channel.assertQueue('tasks');
return { channel, connection };
}
BullMQ is a high-performance message queue and job processing library built specifically for Node.js. It's designed to handle millions of jobs per minute with minimal latency.
// Setting up BullMQ
const { Queue } = require('bullmq');
async function setupBullMQ() {
const queue = new Queue('tasks', {
connection: {
host: 'localhost',
port: 6379,
},
});
return queue;
}
// Adding a job to the queue
const job = await queue.add('processTask', {
taskId: 123,
description: 'Sample task'
});
Message queues and background jobs are used in various real-world applications such as: - Processing payment transactions - Sending emails - Image resizing - Video transcoding - Order fulfillment
In this chapter, we will explore the differences between Microservices and Monolithic architectures. We'll evaluate when to break into microservices, discuss communication patterns like REST, gRPC, and event-driven systems, and learn how to design scalable solutions.
A Monolithic application is built as a single, self-contained unit. It contains all the functionality needed for the application within one codebase.
Microservices are small, independently deployable services that work together to form a complete application. They follow the Β§Single Responsibility PrincipleΒ°.
There are several ways microservices can communicate:
Use microservices when you need scalability, flexibility, or independent deployment cycles. They are ideal for large applications with multiple teams working on different features.
Don't use microservices if your application is simple, has a small team, or doesn't need horizontal scaling. Monoliths are easier to maintain for smaller projects.
Netflix and Amazon use microservices architectures to handle massive scale. Smaller companies like startups often start with monoliths before migrating to microservices.
const grpcService = {
methods: {
getUser: {
requestType: 'UserRequest',
responseType: 'UserProfile'
}
}
};
function chooseArchitecture() {
if (teamSize < 10 && !needForScale) {
return 'Monolith';
} else if (needForScalability || multipleTeams) {
return 'Microservices';
}
}
Question 1 of 16